A caustic is where a flow of paths focuses
Shine light into a coffee cup: the bright, cusped curve on the surface is a caustic. It is where reflected rays pile up — where a whole family of paths, spread out a moment before, momentarily focus onto the same points. The same object appears wherever paths focus: the bright folds and cusps of a gravitational lens, the shell-crossing walls of the cosmic web, and — the subject of this series — the conjugate locus of a sub-Riemannian geometry, where a family of geodesics leaving one point refocuses.
Mathematically these are all one thing. A family of paths is packaged as a Lagrangian map: the projection down to ordinary space of a special half-dimensional surface carried along by a Hamiltonian flow. Where that projection is a local diffeomorphism, paths spread smoothly; where its differential drops rank, they focus. The caustic is precisely the set of critical values of the Lagrangian map — the image of the points where its Jacobian degenerates. For a sub-Riemannian structure the Lagrangian map is the exponential map (Appendix C4), and its caustic is the conjugate locus.
Arnol’d’s list: the only shapes you ever see
Here is the remarkable fact. A generic Lagrangian caustic cannot look like anything — up to smooth change of coordinates, its local pieces come from a short universal list, Arnol’d’s classification of Lagrangian singularities. In low dimension the players are:
| Germ | Name | Local model | Where you see it |
|---|---|---|---|
| $A_2$ | fold | smooth edge | the bright boundary of any caustic |
| $A_3$ | cusp | $y^2 = x^3$ | the point of the coffee-cup curve; lensing cusps |
| $A_4$ | swallowtail | quartic section | where a caustic surface self-crosses |
| $D_4$ | umbilic | elliptic/hyperbolic | isolated highly-symmetric focal points |
The labels $A_k, D_k$ are the same ones that classify simple Lie algebras and du Val surface singularities — the “ADE” pattern that recurs across mathematics. The point for us is blunt: the same fold and the same cusp appear in optics, in cosmology, and in the conjugate locus of every one of the series’ five groups. They are universal.
The obstruction, stated exactly
Combine “caustics are Lagrangian singularities” with “their local germs come from one universal list” and you get the wall the whole series is designed around:
Local generic caustics are group-blind. Hand someone a small patch of a caustic — a fold, a cusp — and ask which group produced it. They cannot answer, because that exact patch is produced by all of them. Any detector that keys on a local germ is fitting a universal, not a group.
This is not pessimism; it is a specification. It tells you precisely where not to look (single local germs) and forces the design that the rest of the series follows: read structure that the ADE germs cannot carry — the tangent-cone growth vector (Appendix C3), the symmetry and moduli of the whole conjugate locus at the pole (C4), and the abnormal stratum (C5) — never one cusp. The detector’s target is that triple, and the quantitative statistic is the deviation of the observed conjugate locus from its own tangent cone’s (C6), not the germ type.
Why the exponential map is a Lagrangian map
For completeness: the sub-Riemannian normal geodesics are the projections of the flow of a
Hamiltonian $H = \tfrac12\sum_i h_i^2$ on the cotangent bundle. The set of covectors of a
fixed energy, carried by that flow, sweeps out a Lagrangian submanifold; the exponential map
$\exp_{q_0}(p) = \gamma_p(1)$ is its projection to the manifold. So the conjugate
locus — the critical values of $\exp_{q_0}$ — is a genuine Lagrangian caustic, subject to
Arnol’d’s classification, and everything above applies to it verbatim. The code’s caustic
detector (src/caustics.py) finds it as the first zero of the Jacobian determinant of that
map.
References
- V. I. Arnol’d (1990). Singularities of Caustics and Wave Fronts. Kluwer.
- V. I. Arnol’d, S. M. Gusein-Zade & A. N. Varchenko (1985). Singularities of Differentiable Maps, Vol. I. Birkhäuser.
- A. Agrachev, G. Charlot, J.-P. Gauthier & V. Zakalyukin (2000). “On sub-Riemannian caustics and wave fronts for contact distributions in the three-space.” J. Dyn. Control Syst. 6, 365–395.
- T. Poston & I. Stewart (1978). Catastrophe Theory and Its Applications. Pitman.