Cookie Consent by Free Privacy Policy Generator E3 — BOSS CMASS × Planck lensing/tSZ (tiled shell) | Igor Moiseev

E3 — BOSS CMASS × Planck lensing/tSZ (tiled shell)

E3 — BOSS CMASS × Planck lensing/tSZ (tiled shell)

Setup: CMASS-North, z ∈ [0.45, 0.55] (291188 galaxies; 274075 used across 18 tiles of 512 Mpc/h at 4 Mpc/h voxels). Spines at matched length (2400 vox per tile), both methods. Stacks: mean map value at spine sky positions vs 200 footprint-constrained RA-rotated/DEC-reflected controls. First pass: no systematics weights, single shell, projected through the full shell depth.

M3 on real data (spine–tidal-frame alignment, null 0.5)

Cross-signal stacks

spine set map stack null mean ± std SNR
hessian kappa 1.078e-03 -9.332e-04 ± 5.979e-03 0.34
hessian y 4.517e-08 -2.951e-08 ± 1.549e-08 4.82
se3_lift kappa -1.400e-03 -6.835e-05 ± 5.940e-03 -0.22
se3_lift y 3.343e-08 -2.487e-08 ± 1.409e-08 4.14

Reading: positive SNR means the spine network sits on more lensing convergence / hot gas than footprint-matched random placements. H3 asks whether the lift’s spines carry at least the Hessian’s signal at equal length.

Verdict (first pass)

  1. H3 — spine networks trace real gas: supported. Both methods’ spine networks show a ~4–5σ Compton-y excess over footprint-matched controls; Planck lensing is null (noise-dominated at these scales, as expected).
  2. H3 comparison — Hessian ≥ lift on real cross-signals (4.8σ vs 4.1σ at matched length), consistent with the corrected H1 and E1b: the simpler model is also the better mass/gas tracer on real data.
  3. M3-real — the lift’s descriptor advantage replicates on the real Universe: spine–tidal-frame alignment 0.677 ± 0.016 vs 0.617 ± 0.016 across 18 independent tiles (null 0.5) — a clean, tile-replicated separation matching the simulation finding.

Caveats (would tighten a second pass)